RISEI Lab Research · Innovation · Elevation Est. 2021 Northwestern University $50M+ Lifetime Funding 170+ Countries Evanston, Illinois RISEI Lab Research · Innovation · Elevation Est. 2021 Northwestern University $50M+ Lifetime Funding 170+ Countries Evanston, Illinois

Working Paper

RISEI Lab Working Paper No. 2026-10 · 2026

Skills, Family, and the Disability Pay Gap

Authors: Yin, M., Seo, R., & Orellana, A.
Series: RISEI Lab Working Paper No. 2026-10 · 2026
Institution: Northwestern University, School of Education and Social Policy
JEL Codes: J14, J24, J70, H53, I38
Keywords: Disability, skills, family background, occupational choice, disability insurance
Download Working Paper (PDF) ↓

Abstract

Workers with disabilities earn 23 percent less than comparable peers. We decompose this gap using direct pre-market skill measures and a sibling fixed-effects design. Pre-market skills explain one-fifth of the gap; education and occupational sorting raise the explained share to nearly half, leaving a within-occupation residual of 13 percent. Sibling comparisons attenuate the gap, though power constraints prevent precise within-family estimates. Mental disability penalties persist within families. Workers with disabilities are less likely to enter and remain in high-paying occupations. This gap implies an annual earnings shortfall of approximately $82 billion and foregone federal tax revenue of $16 billion.

At a glance

Key numbers

−23%Earnings gap between workers with and without disabilities
1/5Share of the gap explained by pre-market skills alone
~1/2Share explained once education and occupation are added
13%Residual gap remaining within occupations
−6.6 ppLower likelihood of entering high-paying occupations at labor-market entry
$82BImplied annual earnings shortfall ($16B foregone federal tax)

Overview

Workers with disabilities earn about 23 percent less than otherwise-comparable peers. A long-standing question is where that gap comes from: skills that accumulate before work, sorting into different jobs, or unequal pay for equal work. This paper brings direct measurement to the question.

Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997, the study decomposes the earnings gap with pre-market cognitive, non-cognitive, and social skill measures collected before labor-market entry, and adds a sibling fixed-effects design to hold family background constant.

Pre-market skills account for about one-fifth of the gap; adding education and occupational sorting raises the explained share to nearly half, leaving a within-occupation residual of 13 percent. Workers with disabilities are 6.6 percentage points less likely to enter high-paying occupations at labor-market entry even conditional on pre-market skills, and mental-disability penalties persist even within families. Scaled to the employed working-age population, the gap implies an annual earnings shortfall of roughly $82 billion and about $16 billion in foregone federal tax revenue.

Findings

What the paper finds

  • Pre-market skills matter, but explain only a fifth.Direct cognitive, non-cognitive, and social skill measures account for roughly one-fifth of the 23 percent disability earnings gap.
  • Education and occupation carry it to about half.Adding schooling and occupational sorting raises the explained share to nearly 50 percent, leaving a 13 percent gap within occupations.
  • Sorting into high-paying jobs is a barrier.Workers with disabilities are 6.6 percentage points less likely to enter high-paying occupations at labor-market entry, even conditional on pre-market skills.
  • Family background does not erase it.Sibling comparisons attenuate the gap, and mental-disability penalties persist within families, though power limits precise within-family estimates.
  • The aggregate stakes are large.The gap implies an annual earnings shortfall of about $82 billion and roughly $16 billion in foregone federal tax revenue.

Cite this paper

Yin, M., Seo, R., & Orellana, A. (2026). Skills, Family, and the Disability Pay Gap. RISEI Lab Working Paper No. 2026-10. Northwestern University.

Funding & disclosure

This study uses the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 (NLSY97). It was developed as part of the Virginia Disability Innovation Fund impact-evaluation portfolio. Views expressed are those of the authors.

Read the full working paper